Terry: Banned for four games
John Terry's defence that he had not racially insulted QPR defender
Anton Ferdinand was "improbable, implausible and contrived", according
to the commission who banned the Chelsea skipper for four matches.
The independent Football Association regulatory commission
said there was "no credible basis" for Terry's claim he had only been
repeating words he thought Ferdinand had accused him of saying.
In their full written reasons for the four-match ban, the commission
said they were satisfied the words "f***ing black c***" were intended as
an insult by Terry. He now has two weeks in which to appeal.
The commission also stated: "There are further aspects of Mr Terry's
defence that the commission finds improbable, implausible and contrived,
and which serve to underline and reinforce our decision.
"The commission is quite satisfied, on the balance of probabilities,
that there is no credible basis for Mr Terry's defence that his use of
the words 'f****** black c***' were directed at Mr Ferdinand by way of
forceful rejection and/or inquiry.
"Instead, we are quite satisfied, and find on the balance of probabilities, that the offending words were said by way of insult.
"We are able to arrive at that decision without needing to make any
adverse findings against Mr Terry arising out of his decision not to
give evidence.
"Accordingly, the commission finds that there is 'clear and convincing' evidence."
The commission said that character references from a number of people
including black players made it clear that Terry was not racially
prejudiced.
"It is accepted by everyone involved in the criminal and disciplinary
proceedings that Mr Terry is not a racist," added the commission.
Ashley Cole's statement supporting Terry's version, and the role
played by a Chelsea club official, has also been questioned by the
commission.
Terry had been cleared in Westminster Magistrates Court in July of a
racially-aggravated public order offence, partly helped by the testimony
of England and Chelsea team-mate Cole.
However, the commission found that there were discrepancies in Cole's
initial statement to FA interviewers of what he heard Ferdinand say to
Terry compared to later statements.
Cole did not mention the word 'black' in the initial interview with
the FA on October 28. On November 3, Chelsea club secretary David
Barnard asked the FA for the specific word 'black' to be inserted into
Cole's witness statement, suggesting that Cole may have heard Ferdinand
use the term.
The commission saw an email exchange between the FA and Barnard and said that should be regarded as "cogent new evidence".
The commission said: "These highly material issues relating to Mr
Cole's evidence were not addressed by the Chief Magistrate - he clearly
did not have the interview notes of the FA's interviewers, or Mr
Barnard's statement before him - and they do not appear in his judgment.
"Accordingly, that material can and should properly be regarded as cogent new evidence.
"Had it been before him, the commission has no doubt that the Chief
Magistrate would have examined Mr Cole's evidence as to what he claims
he heard Mr Ferdinand say to Mr Terry on the pitch very carefully
indeed, or scrutinised it even more closely than he may have done."
It adds: "All of this causes the commission to have very real
concerns about the accuracy of Mr Barnard's recollections, and the
motivation for the assertions that he makes in his witness statement
about what Mr Cole said during the FA interview of him, particularly his
alleged use of the word 'black'."
Ferdinand had suffered "hateful abuse" as a result of the case but had acted with dignity, said the report.
The commission stated: "The victim impact statement of Mr Ferdinand
makes it plain that he has been badly affected by the incident. He has
been the subject of hateful abuse and adverse comments, but has acted
with restraint and dignity."
No comments:
Post a Comment